Featured Post

What's this all about, then?

This blog has been started as a companion to my TNG family history website Baker-Carter Family History  . That site has the data, but someti...

Wednesday, August 30, 2023

Oh Susannah! Or is it just Susan, or Sarah even? Pinning down my 3 x great grandmother - but is she that once or twice?

Lockdown and other pandemic restrictions gave me a bit of an opportunity to ponder some niggling brick wall issues.

It might look like I have gone out on a bit of a limb in interpreting data to show that the Susannah Poole who died on 5 Oct 1874 was the mother of 6 children variously named Stephens/Stevens and Pool/Poole (and two who were named both).  But hear me out!


Kate Poole with her grandmother Susannah, Danbury 1860s

I'll work backwards-ish.  Just to set the scene, Mrs Susannah Poole, widow, had been living in Danbury (1861) and Woodham Ferris (1871) with William and Mary Ann Gilbert Poole, and their daughter Kate; the census recorded that she was born in Rettendon.  In 1851 and 1841 she had been living in Woodham Ferris. Mr James Poole died in 1826 and was buried in Woodham Ferris (20 Jun 1826). She died 5 Oct 1874 in Danbury, aged 89, recorded as widow of James Poole, labourer, and was buried at Woodham Ferrers 10 Oct 1874.

James Pool(e) married Susannah Stevens, a widow, 24 Feb 1822 at Holy Trinity, Southchurch.  James, a carpenter, and Sarah (sic) Poole had two children baptised in Woodham Ferrers - Lucy (bap 7 Apr 1822) and William (bap 12 Mar 1826). 

Lucy Poole (who was my great great grandmother) married William Pond 12 Apr 1848 at the Bethel Chapel, Woodham Ferrers showing her father as James Poole, carpenter, and witnessed by a Samuel Pond (assumed to be William Pond's brother born 1819), and Hannah Raison (assumed to be Hannah Stevens/Pool, who married William Raison - see below).

William Poole married Mary Ann Gilbert Pond (William Pond's sister) 11 Oct 1855 at Chelmsford Register Office, showing his father as James Poole, carpenter, witnessed by John Pond (assumed to be another of the Pond brothers born 1826), and Lucy Raison (assumed to be daughter of the above-mentioned Hannah Raison).

On 1 Aug  1819, a James Poole was baptised at Southchurch to James (a Labourer) and Susan Poole. When this James married Mary Ann Lotes on 1 May 1846 at Baddow Independent Protestant Chapel, he named James Poole, carpenter, as his father, and the witnesses were William Poole and Lucy Poole.

On 4 Aug 1816, a Mary Ann Pool Stevens was baptised at Woodham Ferris as illegitimate daughter of  Susannah Stevens.  When she married Thomas Belcher on 23 Nov 1838, as Mary Ann Stevens, at All Saints Purleigh, she named James Stevens, carpenter, as her father, and the witnesses were a Samuel Carter [no connection yet established] and Lucy Poole.

On 9 Jun 1814 at St John the Baptist, Danbury, a Hannah Poole was baptised, daughter of James, a Carpenter, and Susan.  The timing fits with a Hannah Stephens marrying William Raison at Woodham Ferris on 24 Oct 1833. Witnesses were a William Baycock [no connection yet established] and Mary Stephens (assumed to be the woman baptised Mary Ann Pool Stephens).  Hannah and William Raison had one daughter Lucy, baptised Woodham Ferris 28 Jun 1834, and she married a Robert Scott on 4 Jun 1856 at Woodham Ferris, witnesses being William Pond (presumed the one who was husband of Lucy Poole) and Mary Ann Gilbert Poole (wife of William Poole).

On 10 Sep 1809 at St John the Baptist, Danbury, an Elizabeth Stevens was baptised, daughter of James and Susan Stevens. When she married William Carter at All Saints Purleigh on 19 Jun 1832, the witnesses were a James Smith [no connection yet established] and Hannah Stephens (assumed to be the one who married William Raison the following year).

The register which documents the baptism of Elizabeth Stephens showed the mothers' maiden names in brackets.  Of course hers is indistinct - I first read it as James.  A search of baptisms at Rettendon comes up with Susannah Staines (a good match with the written record) - baptised 1 Aug 1786, daughter of John Staines and Sarah (Rivers).

I can't find a marriage between Susannah Staines and a Stephens/Stevens.  Was he actually Stevens or was he Pool in disguise?  There is a James Stevens who married an Elizabeth Hack 16 Feb 1795 at St John the Baptist Danbury, but no obvious deaths for either in the period between 1795 and 1810.  For Elizabeth the "local" candidate burials were either too young (1800 Chelmsford Cathedral) or too old (1805 Danbury or 1807 Rettendon). There were no local candidates for James.

So it is feasible that the first of the six children was fathered by a James Stephens, but the evidence of the remainder points to James Pool(e) being the father. Here's all that in diagram form:

One last tit-bit.  When Elizabeth Carter nee Stephens registered her 5th child Samuel in 1842 (the first child she had registered under the new system), her maiden name was recorded as "Poole".  The next child, Emma in 1844, was recorded as "Stevens". 

So why the inconsistencies in naming?  Elizabeth Carter could easily have responded to the registration clerk's question about maiden name, by saying what her mum's name was (and in 1843 she was Susannah Poole).  In the case of the "illegitimate" Mary Ann Pool Stevens , Susannah may have felt she couldn't call her Pool(e) because someone in officialdom (Parish Priest or Parish Clerk for example) recognised her as Stevens/Stephens. 

And why was Susannah recorded as "Sarah" when Lucy and William were baptised at Woodham Ferris? Not least she was Susannah or Susan in the census's of 1841-1871. As her mother was called Sarah that again might have been the cause of confusion.

These may be completely off the wall suppositions, but the evidence that the woman born Susannah Staines was mother of each of these six children is quite strong. And it gives an interesting twist on how Susannah's grand-daughter via Lucy Poole, Lucy Pond, might have been tipped off by Susannah's daughter Elizabeth's family that Elizabeth's enterprising son, Henry Carter, might have been able to offer work or lodgings to a young relative in the thriving metropolis of Croydon, Surrey

If Susannah Staines is my 3 x great grandmother not only via Lucy Poole, but also via Elizabeth Stevens, it means Henry Carter and his wife Lucy Pond would have been first cousins or first step-cousins. Crumbs.

No comments:

Post a Comment